Skip to main content

‘ Open your heart and then act ‘





Last week, I analyzed the causes of conflicts around water, the different factors of tensions and their multiple scales. Today, as you can see with this introductory video I would like to look at COP26 and study the different scales of cooperation and their relevance.

As Elizabeth Wathuti says (a Kenyan environmentalist who founded the Green Generation movement to raise awareness of environmental issues with a project that resulted in the planting of 30,000 trees), there is a real urgent need to act and understand the environmental issues in Africa.

The purpose of COP26, as you know, is to bring together leaders from several states to discuss environmental issues. But the question is : is an international scale relevant to understand the real issues? Despite Elisabeth’s truthful speach, her sentence often repeated echoes previous UN meetings with no real consequences : ‘open your heart and act’.


Hence the question: can we understand the international climate consequences? What governance and government should we adopt? How to resolve conflicts around water sharing in Africa?



I have already mentioned it, but Africa is a major victim of climate change, with a growing population, unpredictable and repeated floods and droughts, and above all a pollution and sharing of groundwater resources that create tensions, famines and many deaths. Indeed, as Wathuti puts it: ‘The decision you make here will determine whether children will have food and water’

The different forms of water  cooperation in Africa:


International cooperation on the management of transboundary aquifers systems in Africa are less developed. However, initiatives emerged when the utilisation of common groundwater is high, when there is dependency or when a negative impact of overuse is felt. (Scheumann et. al, 2009)

We can see two forms of cooperation : 

1. Where countries share a transboundary aquifer and a transboundary river/lake : management includes groundwater resources and surface water. E.g : the Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC) and the Orange-Senqu River Basin Commission (ORASECOM). (Scheumann et. al, 2009)

 2. Where there is no transboundary river and the aquifer is no linked to bodies of transboundary surface water : then entities focus on groundwater resources. E.g = Joint Authority for the Study and Development of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (NSAS) 

United nation water convention attempt at international water course usage

There were a  need for modern international water law and especially an articulate and broad based water law. The UN Attempt is to bring uniformity, to international water law, which led to the International Law Association (ILA) to develop the Helsinki Rules in 1966 but only 12 states out of the 35 have ratified the treaty (Saliu et. al, 2011).

Regional cooperation

There is a need to resolve disputes over water, integrate water into regional strategic cooperation, domestic water initiatives, systems rehabilitation, increasing data collection, new world water convention. (Saliu et. al, 2011)

Indeed, it is true to recall that the pattern of water distribution has caused political crises and several wars have been fought because of water. 

What governance ? 

Water governance is characterised by ‘changing power relations’. Multi-sectoral approaches are encouraged and developed like Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) which emphasises local actors, and express ‘the need for more effective cooperative  practices and more cost-efficient  than higher scales of governance’. Governance is embodied in institutional mechanisms like co-management, public-private partnerships and social-private partnerships which are new ways in which the states, market and communities interacts.

 



Various frameworks proposed by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) all place great emphasis on cooperative governance: the Water Services Act (1997b), National Water Act (1998a). Strategy demands more cohesion between the national, provincial and local governments through mechanisms such as information sharing. (Mirumachi et. al, 2010)


Water management has to deal with interdependence between countries, which is not always recognised while essential in decision-making process, and also with the balance of power among different stakeholders with diverse interests and the limited ability for many of the stakeholders to mobilise the technical resources required. (Mirumachi et. al, 2010)



But...

Who can be responsible for the achievement of water security ? 

Who controls water quality and decides how much waste may be dumped into rivers by industries and municipalities, and under what conditions? How is the extraction of underground water regulated to ensure that wells do not run dry? And who decides how  much effort – and sacrifice – should be devoted to environmental protection, since this invariably means restraining the use of the resource? (Muller, 2019)

Participation of all levels of government and different sectors of civil society in the decision-making process (interaction between local authorities and their citizens), is an essential element of good governance to meet the challenge of sustainability and resolve conflicts around water. (Diouf, 2008).


So we can say that sustainable development is not just a simple project of intent in favour of the environment. Rather, it is part of a dynamic of socio-economic and cultural reconstruction for the benefit of present and future generations. (Diouf, 2008).


It is not enough for the State and the Government to adopt the principles of sustainable development without ensuring effective implementation of the recommendations made in Agenda 21/COP26.


Success depends above all on real political will, efficiency and transparency in the management of business that affects both the economy, the social and the environment. And this cannot lead to positive results, to the benefit of the populations and especially the most disadvantaged, without real investment in human capital and reducing inequality.



Therefore, I will see the limits of cooperation around water in a future post. Thank you for reading ! 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The limits of cooperation : Water as a profit

  In this post, I would like to analyze and question the relevance of aid and   cooperation and their effectiveness. Cause if several organizations exist (UNWC, IWRM, Water Act), we still have to question their effectiveness and relevance at the scale of the African continent and the world. I would also like to address the problem of an European and international vision and presence in the management of conflicts around water in Africa. Indeed, since the majority of African countries are former colonies, it is interesting to wonder what role the old metropolises still play and what hypocrisy lies behind a desire to develop Africa. • What success for the IWRM ?  IWRM is the dominant organisation in water resource management in the world. It was promoted by multilateral and regional development banks and donor agencies and knew a rapid spread in southern Africa over the past two decades.  IRWM is known for having contributed to decentralisation which has led to experimentation wit

Water wars in Africa : which actors for which scales ?

  A woman walks past soldiers outside Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Image Hi everyone !!     Last week, I used the case of the Nile Basin to analyze the different issues of water sharing in Africa.  We’ve seen several related notions in order to understand the legitimacy of Ethiopia to impose a dam that could have negative consequences on downstream countries. Today I would like to see in more detail the real conflicts around water that can degenerate into ‘water wars’. Therefore, we will ask the following questions: Can water become a weapon ? What forms can water-related conflicts take in Africa? What are the causes of water wars in Africa ?   Water usage conflicts :   The development of the population, industry and agriculture in Africa increases water needs and therefore the pressure between countries ( Hayton, 1961 ) as the majority of water sources are shared by several countries and water treaties are insufficient to guarantee p

Is there really no water in Africa? Water and development in Africa: a political battle against a colonialist vision.

 Hi everyone and welcome to this blog !!  I’ve decided to start by introducing why I think that relations between Africa, water, development and politics are very interesting to study, by questioning the nature of these relationships (co-dependence, causality, effect) in order to identify several general problems that will guide us throughout this blog.   Engraving of the Berlin Conference, 1885      I would like to start with what I think is one of the bases of the problems : the European political vision of Africa and the world. Indeed, the conference of Berlin in 1885 brought together representatives of several European countries to decide on the sharing and borders of future African countries (regardless of local populations). The very principle of this meeting is based on a previous principle which was discussed with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 between several European countries that create the idea that a state should have fixed borders to defend. Europe established itself i